rishel.org

12/5/2007

Beowulf 3D: Almost Out Of The Uncanny Valley?

As a late birthday present Gail and Bryon watched Cory for Meg and me last Saturday. We took the time to go see Beowulf in 3D.
The way the actual Anglo-Saxon text was integrated into the songs and the speech of Grendel was well done. The additions to the story line to make the story more than just "I am Beowulf, I killed a monster and his mother and then 30 years later I killed a dragon and died" were well done, a tied into the mythology setting. If the movie had been made with more traditional film-making (live action actors, CGI Monsters) , We'd only be talking about the brilliance of the Gaiman/Avery script, but with "Performance Capture" and 3D presentation are really what steals the show.
Unlike the dead mannequin eyes all the Tom Hanks clones had in The Polar Express1 we see glimpses of actual emotion being portrayed by these fancy puppets. This is partly because the 3D nature of the film adds a lot of realism, but also the subtle movement of an eyelid or movement of pupils allow Anthony Hopkins character to really express the sorrow and grief he feels. Unfortunately, that level of emotion still hit or miss. For every character interaction where I feel like I'm seeing real emotion, there are 3 where it just doesn't look right, often coming from John Malkovich and Robin Wright Penn's characters. And I can't define what's not right2. Perhaps I'm just studying their faces a lot more closely because I know what I'm seeing is not a direct capture of a human on film, so what I'm noticing are flaws in a performance translated by the computers to the screen, not a flaw in the capturing process.

Overall, I give this movie 2.5 waxy turnips.


1 Perhaps this is just a result of Tom Hanks? I kid, I kid.

2 But that not-rightness is detected by an ancient reptilian portion of my brain.

Filed under: Movies — Jay @ 10:28 am

10/13/2005

  • Serenity In 2000 Words: Do not click on the following link unless you have already seen Serenity. Serenity in 2000 words. if you haven't seen Serenity yet, why not? Nevermind, I don't care, go see it. (1)

9/16/2005

  • Firefly Marathon: This Saturday: This Saturday (Tomorrow), Meg and I are hosting a Marathon of Firefly from 10 am to 10 pm, watching all 13 episodes. If you're in the area and I haven't emailed you about this, I'm sorry, leave a comment or email me if you're interested and haven't told us yet.

    On a totally unrelated note, have you see the "this week last year" box on the right side of the screen? Wow, was I crazy-productive blogwise this time last year. (0)

2/19/2005

Finding Neverland

Meg and I went to see Finding Neverland this afternoon. Wow. What a movie. The cast was great: Depp, Winslet, Hoffman. The story was very good, and I learned a bit more about some of the metaphors that appear in the Peter Pan story. While watching the movie, I got a little upset. I've seen the old Mary Martin version of Peter pan a lot, and that darn blinking light that plays Tinkerbell gets me every time. She drinks the poison to save Peter and we have to clap to save her. Make fun all you want, but I get teary eyed every time I see that darn blinkin' light and bell start to fade. It only got worse when… well.. I don't want to give away too much of the movie. I hope it wins some Oscars. It sure deserves them.

Filed under: Movies — Jay @ 10:46 pm
Comments (0)

11/8/2004

Leaves!

Saturday I got up ealier and took Meg out for a surprise viewing of The Incredibles. I'd write a review of the story (Wonderful!) and of the voice acting (Samuel L. Jackson and Jason Lee, how can you go wrong?) but my problem with seeing Pixar movies, is I have to see them at least twice before I can appreciate them as movies. The first time I watch them, I'm too amazed at how much further they've come at animating (simulating?) whatever it is that they've decided to focus on. Toy Story, Bug's Life, and Toy Story 2 were all about getting simple character animation down. Monsters, Inc showed a clear emphasis on learning how to simulate the movement of hair. Finding Nemo was all about getting their use of light down, but even watching Nemo, you could see movement of hair that they learned from Monsters really paid off in the way they animated the anenenmeneone. The Incredibles was all about perfecting the hair work they started in Monsters and showing off the light work they got right in Nemo. Not only can we see the hair move when the characters move, we can see the hair get wet, we see each individual strand of hair, and how it has a unique coloration. Moving beyond just hair, you could see light reflected off of their uniforms in a distractingly real way to me. I'll definitely need to see it again so I'll be more prepared to pay attention to the story instead of staring in awe at the background and minutiae of character design.

More writing below, none about the above topics though. (more…)

Filed under: Gadgets, Home Ownership, Movies — Jay @ 3:26 pm
Comments (2)

Powered by WordPress